Patexia Insight 201: Top Companies in Patent Litigation for 2024

We released our fourth annual Patent Litigation Intelligence Report in late January. This report offers a comprehensive overview of the landscape, providing high-level statistics and ranking all stakeholders involved in patent litigation. In our previous insights, we've explored the top litigation venues, revealing how Texas continues to dominate, as well as covered the lateral moves among the top patent attorneys in the past twelve months. Today, our focus shifts to the most active and best-performing companies in patent litigation.
The Patent Litigation Intelligence Report focuses on cases filed over the past five years, from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023, using the latest data update as of December 1, 2023. This timeframe provides the necessary time for cases to progress and conclude, yielding valuable insights, especially from terminated cases which are used in evaluating the performance of all entities involved. Throughout this five-year span, the yearly caseload peaked in 2021 with 3,953 filings, reflecting a modest 0.38% increase in litigation activity compared to the prior year. Conversely, 2022 witnessed a downturn in overall filings, totaling 3,766 cases, marking a 4.73% decrease from 2021. This downward trajectory continued into 2023, with filings further decreasing by 17.5%, resulting in a total of 3,108 cases. On the other hand, the number of patents involved in these cases displayed varied trajectories, steadily rising from 2018 to 2021, experiencing a dip in 2022, and subsequently observing a slight upturn in 2023. The chart below illustrates the annual caseload and the number of patents implicated in these cases during the period of study, including data for the full years of 2018 and 2023.

In the dynamic landscape of patent litigation, staying ahead demands also a keen understanding of the key players. Patexia's Patent Litigation Intelligence Report provides an extensive overview, covering not only the industry leaders but also the entire list of companies, firms, and attorneys engaged in patent litigation along with their full metrics, including the activity and performance rankings and scores. Between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023, a total of 30,671 companies participated in one or more patent litigation cases, with 5,811 acting as plaintiffs and 26,153 as defendants. On average, each company was involved in 1.9 cases, though activity levels varied significantly among companies. To evaluate and rank entities by activity, we developed the Activity Score, calculated as a weighted average of the number of cases and patents involved given that the workload directly correlates with the number of patents involved. Furthermore, we recognize that more recent activity is a better indicator of current engagement. Therefore, we used different weights for cases filed in different years, prioritizing recent filings. This approach ensures that companies demonstrating more recent activity rank higher, providing a more accurate reflection of their current level of engagement in patent litigation. The following two tables feature the top five most active plaintiffs and defendants, along with their corresponding number of cases and patents as ranked in our Patent Litigation Intelligence Report 2024.
| Plaintiff Activity Rank | Company | Plaintiff Cases | Plaintiff Unique Patents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IP Edge LLC | 1,029 | 75 |
| 2 | Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | 406 | 88 |
| 3 | WSOU Investments LLC | 217 | 148 |
| 4 | Rothschild Patent Imaging, LLC | 494 | 46 |
| 5 | Uniloc | 233 | 78 |
| Defendant Activity Rank | Company | Defendant Cases | Defendant Unique Patents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung Electronics | 276 | 891 |
| 2 | Alphabet Inc. | 275 | 467 |
| 3 | Apple Inc. | 224 | 539 |
| 4 | Amazon, Inc. | 170 | 408 |
| 5 | LG Electronics | 126 | 420 |
The Success Score is a crucial metric derived from terminated cases, where we assign a score to each party based on the conclusion and the degree of favorability for each. Additionally, we take into account external factors such as decisions from PTAB proceedings and settlements. This alone, however, is insufficient for evaluating performance, as companies with very few cases may rank higher than their more active counterparts. To address this, we introduced the Performance Score, which is a weighted average of success and activity scores. This metric ensures that both successful outcomes and active engagement are appropriately considered in the performance evaluation. The following two tables cover the top five best-performing plaintiff and defendant companies:
| Plaintiff Performance Rank | Company | Plaintiff Cases | Plaintiff Performance Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EssilorLuxottica SA | 57 | 100.00% |
| 2 | Canon Inc. | 35 | 99.79% |
| 3 | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 37 | 98.14% |
| 4 | Seiko Epson Corporation | 19 | 98.09% |
| 5 | Fitness Anywhere LLC | 8 | 97.14% |
|
Defendant Performance Rank |
Company | Defendant Cases | Defendant Performance Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung Electronics | 276 | 100.00% |
| 2 | HTC Corporation | 35 | 99.60% |
| 3 | SunRun Inc. | 24 | 99.47% |
| 4 | Apple Inc. | 224 | 99.44% |
| 5 | Alphabet Inc. | 275 | 99.29% |
The full Patent Litigation Intelligence Report dives into trends related to patent litigation and conducts an in-depth analysis from various perspectives. This includes examining the most active district courts, identifying the most litigated patents, and exploring prevalent technologies in litigation, among other crucial factors. Additionally, the report ranks law firms and attorneys based on their activity and performance, providing stakeholders with comprehensive insights to make informed decisions and navigate the complexities of patent litigation effectively.
Stay tuned as in the following weeks we will be covering some of the very best patent litigation law firms and attorneys as highlighted in our report!
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…