Jury Orders U.S. Bancorp to Pay $3 Million to Solutran for Infringing Patents for Paper Check Processing Technology
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Patent Judgments & Awards
In another win in a string of victories for Solutran, Inc. in its long-running patent dispute with U.S. Bancorp, a jury in the U.S. District Court in Minnesota found that Solutran was entitled to both lost profits and a reasonable royalty for U.S. Bancorp’s infringement of a patent on Solutran’s SPIN™ technology for paper check processing. Solutran claims that this technology produces cost savings for its users on the order of 50-75%.
The lawsuit, which has been pending since September 2013, marked a number of victories for Solutran on the way to the recent damages award. Solutran first survived U.S. Bancorp’s challenge to the validity of its patent before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and then prevailed on appeal to the Federal Circuit. The trial judge then ruled that U.S. Bancorp infringed Solutran’s patent.
In March 2018, the Minnesota jury, after listening to evidence that the defendants sold infringing systems to such companies as Target, Barnes & Noble, U-Haul, and Pilot Travel Center, awarded Solutran both lost profits and reasonable-royalty damages totaling about $3.3 million. The jury’s damages calculations were based on 130 million transactions performed with the infringing system.
Solutran has announced that it intends to seek a permanent injunction from the district court barring U.S. Bancorp and Elavon from marketing its widely used Electronic Check Service (ECS) check processing system.
Written by: Sean Murray and Loni Morrow
Edited by: John Sganga, Joseph Cianfrani, and Boris Zelkind
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…