Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged electronics · clear
Written by : Mark Kachner and Kimberly M. Papadantonakis, Ph.D. VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC v. INTEL CORP. Before Moore , Chen, and Kleeh. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary : The Federal Circuit reversed…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel and Stella B. Haynes Kiehn GENUINE ENABLING TECHNOLOGY LLC v. SONY GROUP CORPORATION Before Dyk, Taranto, and Chen . Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : The Federal Circuit…
Written by : Ari Feinstein and Kathryn M. McCarthy WILLIS ELECTRIC CO., LTD. v. POLYGROUP LTD. (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) Before Moore , Stark, and Oetken (sitting by designation). Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of…
Written by : Jacob R. Rosenbaum and Jamal Perry FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC v. REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION Before Reyna, Bryson, and Stoll . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary : The district…
Written by : Daniel Kiang and Daniel M. Mittelstein MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD., HITACHI MAXELL, LTD., NKA MAXELL HOLDINGS, LTD., MAXELL, LTD. v. LG ELECTRONICS INC., LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. Before Taranto, Clevenger, and Hughes . Appeal from the United States…
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery and Daniel P. Hughes LYNK LABS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Before Lourie, Prost , and Stark Summary: In an IPR, a patent application is considered a “printed publication” as of the application’s…
Written by : Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. & Justin J. Gillett Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Nokia Corporation Before Dyk, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the Central District of California. Summary: Applying California law, the phrase “entirely on my…
Written by : Alistair J. McIntyre & Jeremy Anapol MAXELL, LTD., V. AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED Before Prost, Taranto , and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary : Two claim limitations are not…
Written by : Jamal Perry & Daniel Kiang RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. v. PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A Before Chen, Stoll , and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claimed ranges can be narrower than alternative, broader ranges…
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery & Daniel Kiang APPLE INC. v. COREPHOTONICS, LTD. Before Stoll , Linn, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR final written decision based on a party’s brief mention of an error in an…
Written by : Brian C. Barnes & Karen Cassidy Selvaggio PARUS HOLDINGS, INC. V. GOOGLE LLC Before Lourie , Bryson, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : PTAB did not err in declining…
Written by : Ashley C. Morales & Hans L. Mayer BOT M8 LLC v. SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC Before Prost , Reyna, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : A party challenging the Board’s decision by alleging claim…
