Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged software & information technology · clear
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery & Jeremy Anapol TREEHOUSE AVATAR LLC v. VALVE CORPORATION Before Lourie, Reyna , and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Summary : The district court did not abuse its…
IN RE KILLIAN Before Taranto, Clevenger, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Section 101 jurisprudence is still sound post- Dobbs . Killian applied for a patent related to a system and method “for determining eligibility…
IN RE: PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. Before Dyk , Reyna, and Chen. Summary: The USPTO policy of refusing to consider Requests for Director Rehearing of decisions denying institution of IPR and PGR does not violate the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.…
LSI CORPORATION v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Before Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Determining whether a patent or application’s disclosure is “by another” under § 102(e)…
IN RE MCDONALD Before Newman, Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: When applying for reissue, a patent applicant may not recapture subject matter that was intentionally surrendered to overcome a § 101…
SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC v. HULU, LLC Before Prost, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: It was improper to find a claim limitation was missing without affirmatively construing…
ACCELERATION BAY LLC v. TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE Before Moore, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: The “final assembler” theory of direct infringement does not apply to…
In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC Before Prost, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: A patent directed to a medley of mental processes with no inventive concept is patent ineligible under 35…
TRIMBLE INC. v. PERDIEMCO LLC Before Judges Newman, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Repeated email, phone, and letter communications threatening patent infringement litigation…
FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. v. ALPHONSO INC. Before Judges Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Summary: Patent claims were directed to an abstract idea where the claims failed to recite…
RAIN COMPUTING, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. Before Lourie, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Summary: The structure for performing a function of a means-plus-function term may not be a…
E GE NERA, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Before Prost, Stoll, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Summary: A patentee that successfully petitioned to correct a patent’s inventorship by removing a…
