Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged pgr · clear
Over the past decade, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has become one of the most influential venues in U.S. patent law. From fast-moving Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) to Post-Grant Reviews (PGRs), PTAB has redefined how companies defend, challenge,…
In the dynamic realm of intellectual property, remaining at the forefront is absolutely essential. Tomorrow marks the release of a pivotal milestone – the seventh edition of our IPR Intelligence Report, now reborn as the PTAB Intelligence Report.…
In the world of patent law, Post-Grant Review (PGR) and Inter Partes Review (IPR) are crucial mechanisms for challenging the validity of issued patents. Understanding the differences between PGR and IPR is essential for patent owners and challengers alike.…
When facing a patent dispute, it's crucial to understand the different proceedings available at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Each proceeding offers unique advantages and considerations. In this article, we will explore the key factors to…
On November 16, 2017, the USPTO issued new procedures ( “ Standard Operating Procedure 9” ) for governing cases remanded from the Federal Circuit. These procedures are applicable to all decisions remanded from the Federal Circuit to the PTAB,…
In a Post-Grant Review (“PGR”) at the U.S Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), a petitioner can challenge the validity of a patent on several grounds including prior art, on-sale or public-use activity, and lack of compliance with…
