Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged issue preclusion · clear
CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES LP V. INGENIO, INC., DBA KEEN, ETHER, THRYV, INC. Before Stoll , Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary: Ingenio’s IPR petition was partially…
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC v. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS Before Prost , Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : An IPR is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) if, at the time of institution, the petitioner is in privity…
Unchallenged Claim Falls on Summary Judgement Back in 2016, I flagged a few district court decisions that leveraged Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) fact-finding on summary determination . These decisions weighed the fact finding of the expert agency as…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Newman, Lourie , and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Summary : Collateral estoppel does not apply to a prior decision of no invalidity under § 101, where the…
