Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged communications technology · clear
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Sophia F. Zahn OLLNOVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC [OPINION] Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A verdict form…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel and Elizabeth "Lizzy" Do RECENTIVE ANALYTICS, INC. v. FOX CORP. Before Dyk , Prost, and Goldberg. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : The Federal Circuit found that…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel and Zachery Rufa FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. Before Lourie , Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : The defense of equitable estoppel requires…
Written by : Mengmeng Du & Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. IN RE: STINGRAY IP SOLUTIONS, LLC Before Lourie, Taranto, and Stark . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A defendant’s post-suit, unilateral…
UNILOC USA, INC. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC Before Lourie, Dyk , and Hughes. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Failure to vacate an adverse ruling regarding a lack of standing when settling a prior suit collaterally…
GOOGLE LLC v. IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC. Before Dyk, Schall, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: For purposes of determining whether a reference was prior art, the Board has an obligation to resolve fundamental testimonial…
APPLE INC. V. WI-LAN INC. Before Moore , Chief Judge , Bryson, and Prost. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Summary : Construing a broad claim term to be re-defined as a disclosed species on a theory that…
APPLE, INC. v. QUALCOMM, INC. Before Newman, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Apple lacked standing to appeal an IPR decision upholding patents that Apple licenses from Qualcomm, in light of a prior decision with…
COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC. Before Stoll, Reyna, and Schall. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: When a party distinguishes technology in the prior art to preserve validity, that same technology…
COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC. Before Stoll, Reyna, and Schall. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: When a party distinguishes technology in the prior art to preserve validity, that same technology…
FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. v. ALPHONSO INC. Before Judges Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Summary: Patent claims were directed to an abstract idea where the claims failed to recite…
APPLE, INC. v. QUALCOMM, INC. Before Moore, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Apple lacked standing to appeal an IPR decision upholding patents it licenses from Qualcomm, despite Apple’s royalty payments for a…
