Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged communications · clear
Written by : Daniel Kiang and Brandon Cormier US PATENT NO. 7,679,637 LLC v GOOGLE LLC Before Moore , Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Summary: Result-oriented claims were found…
Written by : Joshua M. Martineau and Douglas B. Wentzel SIERRA WIRELESS, ULC V. SISVEL S.P.A. Before Moore , Schall, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The Board erred by finding method-claim steps connected by…
Written by : Brandon G. Smith ROKU, INC. v. UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC. Before Newman, Reyna, and Stoll . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : When an appeal from the PTAB addresses only a factual issue, the substantial evidence…
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v. TCL CORPORATION Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Publications shelved in publicly accessible libraries may be publicly available prior art references as of the…
Written by Nathanael Luman , Ph.D. and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D. The PTAB granted-in-part motions to amend in three related proceedings: Activision Blizzard, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay, LLC, IPR2015-01953, Paper 107 (P.T.A.B. sealed on March 23, 2017, made…
Written by Peter Law and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D. On January 25, 2017, a panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) held that “Eleventh Amendment Immunity bars the institution of an inter partes review against an unconsenting state that has not…
Written by Damien Howard and Michael L. Fuller Is a patent directed to electronic communications between computing devices patent eligible? As with many legal questions, the answer to this question is not black and white. In the recent Fitbit, Inc. v.…
