Trump Signs Economic and Trade Agreement with China
Contributed by Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
On January 15, 2020, President Trump signed a lengthy “Economic and Trade Agreement Between the Government of the [US] and the Government of [P. R. of China].” Chapter 1 is entitled “Intellectual Property” that contains Sections on trade secrets, pharmaceuticals, patents, piracy and counterfeiting, geographical indications (involving TM disputes), manufacture and export of pirated and counterfeit goods (including counterfeit medicines), bad faith trademarks, judicial enforcement (e.g., via criminal proceedings), bilateral cooperation and implementation.
Most of the Sections seem to be intended to require China to move its IP system so that it is more closely aligned with U.S. IP law. Many of the articles, which can be lengthy, end with “The [US] affirms that existing U.S. measures afford treatment equivalent to that provided for in this Article”. In other words, we are doing enough right now.
This includes the two articles in Section C – Pharmaceutical-Related IP—and Section D: “Patents”, which only contains one article and relates to patent term extension. The two articles under “Pharmaceutical-Related Intellectual Property, permit applicants for pharmaceutical patents to rely on supplemental data to satisfy relevant requirements of patentability [ed.’s note: 132 Declarations?], and requires China to develop Hatch-Waxman type proceedings to manage the marketing of generics.
Section F (1.18) requires China to take expeditious enforcement action against counterfeit “medicines and biologics.” Interestingly, this article requires China to share plant inspection data with the US and to publish information reporting data on enforcement measures.
Section J is entitled “Bilateral Cooperation on Intellectual Property Protection” and require “biennial cooperation of work plans” to “promote pragmatic cooperation in this area.” I wonder if that will include reaching agreement on what inventions are eligible for patent protection?
This article was originally published on Patents4Life.com.
Patents4Life is sponsored by Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A
More insights
One Definition and the Walls Come Down District Court Dismisses Copyright Claim Based on Misclassified Cabinet Registration
Written by : Ian W. Gillies and Eric R. Blosser Key Takeaway: A federal district court dismissed a copyright infringement claim on the grounds that the work in the asserted registration had been improperly classified under the Copyright Act. This case…
2 Bankrupt Crew Intersection Between Bankruptcy and Copyright Law
Written by : Greg Phillips & Eric R. Blosser Key Takeaways: Two members of rap group 2 Live Crew, and the heirs of a third member, attempted to terminate a transfer of copyright ownership in several records the group made in the 1980s under statutory…
How Cnn S Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against Perplexity Ai Could Alter the Fair Use Landscape
Written by : Mark Lezama Key Takeaway : CNN’s copyright infringement lawsuit against Perplexity AI stands apart from prior AI copyright cases because of allegations that Perplexity pursued a licensing deal with CNN, failed to reach an agreement, and…