Patexia Insight 249: Spotlight on the Top Trademark Attorneys of 2025

Every year, thousands of trademark professionals strengthen the identity of brands through diligent filing, prosecution, and protection of marks before the USPTO. Patexia’s Trademark Intelligence Report 2025 takes a data-driven look at this ecosystem, analyzing more than three million trademark applications filed between 2020 and 2024. The report highlights the attorneys and law firms leading the way in both activity and performance, those who not only manage high volumes of filings but also demonstrate exceptional success rates and efficiency in securing registrations for their clients.
Trademark Filing Trends (2020–2024)

Trademark filings at the USPTO showed notable year-over-year fluctuations over the past five years. Filings peaked in 2020 with 693,362 applications, followed by a slight decline of 1.31% to 684,275 in 2021. A larger drop occurred in 2022, with filings falling 19.42% to 551,367, and a further 1.06% decline in 2023 brought the total to 545,543. In 2024, filings rebounded by 9.39% to 596,791. Earlier fluctuations were largely driven by foreign activity, particularly from China, while recent USPTO measures to strengthen identity verification and representation requirements have helped reduce low-quality or fraudulent filings.
Top Two Percent: Most Active and Best-Performing Attorneys
Behind these filings are the attorneys who guide applicants through the USPTO process. Their expertise, strategy, and experience play a key role in turning applications into successful registrations. While overall filing numbers provide a picture of trademark activity, the performance of individual attorneys determines how efficiently and effectively brands secure protection.
Patexia’s Trademark Intelligence Report 2025 highlights the top-performing trademark attorneys based on both activity and success. Attorneys are evaluated not only by the number of applications they handle but also by their ability to navigate office actions, maintain high registration rates, and achieve approvals with minimal delays. The report’s methodology also adjusts for factors such as case complexity and examiner variation, offering a balanced comparison across firms and individuals.
Our analysis identified 31,618 attorneys actively engaged in trademark prosecution. From this group, we highlight a selection of professionals who stand out due to either their high level of activity or exceptional performance. Many of the top-ranked attorneys also represent international clients, reflecting the increasingly global nature of brand protection. Rising stars in the rankings further illustrate how specialization in certain industries or trademark classes can propel attorneys to the top of the field. Being recognized among the top 600 attorneys, representing the top two percent, is a significant accomplishment in the field.
| Attorney | Law Firm | Trademarks | Category |
Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Natter | Haug Partners | 1,495 | Activity Rank | 65 |
| Janet Cabral Moreira | Caldera Law PLLC | 1252 | Overall Rank | 80 |
| Douglas Robert Wolf | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 984 | Activity Rank | 102 |
| Joel R. Feldman | Greenberg Traurig LLP | 534 | Activity Rank | 229 |
| William M. Bryner | Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton | 316 | Activity Rank | 487 |
| Nadya M. Sand | Alston & Bird | 276 | Activity Rank | 599 |
About the Report
The Trademark Intelligence Report 2025 offers data-driven insights and rankings for the top companies, law firms, and attorneys in the U.S. trademark landscape. Covering a five-year period from 2020 to 2024, the report provides actionable intelligence to help corporations, firms, and individual practitioners benchmark performance, identify opportunities, and inform strategic decisions. It includes a comprehensive PDF with detailed statistics, as well as an Excel file featuring metrics for the top 2,000 most active entities, including lateral moves and growth trends. Explore the full report to discover who is leading in trademark prosecution and see how your organization or career measures up.
More insights
Not All Mifflins Are Equal: When Commercial Impression Saves the Day
Written by : Rosaleen Chou Key Takeaway: Even where goods are identical or closely related, the TTAB continues to place significant weight on differences in commercial impression. A mark’s meaning, whether driven by pop culture context or literal…
Sound Marks They Are More Than Just Alright Alright Alright 20260629
Written by : Charlene A. Azema & Alexander G. Trimes Key Takeaway: Non-traditional trademarks like sound marks can provide valuable protection for distinctive sounds that function as source identifiers, particularly where other forms of intellectual…
Should Have Written a Better Consent and How Ey
Written by : Catherine Holland & Eric R. Blosser Key Takeaway: The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“ TTAB ” or “the Board”) afforded no weight to a bare-bones trademark consent agreement that contained no provisions for the…