Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Case

N
Nika Aldrich
Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt
November 10, 2025PTAB1 min read

Contributed by Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.

CASE OF THE WEEK

In re Motorola Solutions, Inc., Appeal No. 2025-134 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2025)


Our case of the week is one of a series of cases challenging newly-enacted procedures by the Trump Administration that are having a significant effect on the inter partes review regime set up by the America Invents Act.  In a sign that the Federal Circuit may not interfere with the overhauling of the IPR system, the Federal Circuit denied a mandamus petition.

The America Invents Act established a new procedure for parties to challenge the validity of patents: the inter partes review.  That procedure has been wildly successful for patent challengers—especially those who have been accused of patent infringement.  Rather than litigate a case for years in the federal court system, an accused infringer can seek a finding that the patent is invalid from a panel of three judges at the Patent Office in a process that is faster and less expensive than in federal court, has a lower burden of proof, and does not involve the same level of uncertainty as having a case decided by a jury.  Over the past twelve years, thousands of petitions for inter partes review have been filed, and thousands of patents have been found invalid.

READ MORE

Editors:

Nika Aldrich, IP Litigation Group Leader, Schwabe

Jason A. Wrubleski, Shareholder

 

More insights

Data: FDA Orange & Purple Books · prosecution & litigation metadata · read-only.