The Federal Circuit Grounds US SPACE FORCE Trademark Application
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by:Daniel Kiang and Sameer Khan
Before Moore, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Summary: Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars registration of a pending application for a mark that falsely suggests a connection as of the time of the examination and the false connection inquiry may include evidence arising during the examination process.
In a March 2018 speech, President Trump proposed the formation of a U.S. military branch called "Space Force." Several days later, Thomas D. Foster, APC filed an intent-to-use trademark application for US SPACE FORCE. Later, President Trump issued a directive to create the U.S. Space Force and, in 2019, Congress passed legislation establishing the military branch. The examining attorney refused registration of US SPACE FORCE under Section 2(a), and the TTAB affirmed, finding a false suggestion of connection with the United States.
On appeal, Foster argued that the Board erred by considering evidence arising after his filing date and that the Board’s findings under the false connection test were unsupported by substantial evidence. The Federal Circuit rejected the timing argument and explained that, in contrast to a cancellation proceeding where the Board is required to assess the facts as of the time the mark is registered, this case involved a refusal to register. The appropriate timing could not be the registration date of the mark because the mark was never registered. Thus, the Federal Circuit held that in refusal-to-register cases, the false connection inquiry can include evidence that arises during the examination process.
The Federal Circuit also found ample evidence (including national media coverage and formal establishment of the Space Force) supporting the Board’s conclusion that Foster’s mark falsely suggested a connection with the United States. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the refusal to register the US SPACE FORCE mark.
Editor: Sean Murray
More insights
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation of Patent for Lack of Enablement of Claims Directed to a Method of Treating a Patient with a Unit Dosage in Wyeth Llc v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp
Written by : Eric Furman, Ph.D. and Ashley C. Morales Key Takeaway: Federal Circuit invalidates patent claims directed to a method for treating non-small cell lung cancer through administration of “a unit dosage” of an irreversible epidermal…
When About Becomes Indefinite Federal Circuit Provides Guidance for Life Science Patent Applications Regarding Limits of Approximation in Enviro Tech v Safe Foods
Written by : Jason J. Jardine and Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. Key Takeaway: The term “about” remains useful in biotech and pharmaceutical claims, but only if the patent provides objective guidance about what the term means. Absent that guidance,…
When Any Patent Means No Patent Federal Circuit Reverses Non Specific Verdict
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Sophia F. Zahn OLLNOVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC [OPINION] Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A verdict form…