Defendant Awarded Attorney Fees After NPE Dismissed Frivolous Case with Prejudice
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
BLACKBIRD TECH LLC v. HEALTH IN MOTION LLC
Before Wallach, Prost, and Hughes. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
Summary: The Federal Circuit affirmed a finding that a frivolous patent case was exceptional and an award of more than $360,000 in attorney fees after Plaintiff persisted with the case for nineteen months and then dismissed the case with prejudice before trial.
Blackbird, a non-practicing entity, sued Health in Motion for patent infringement related to exercise equipment. Health in Motion refused multiple settlement offers including a walk-away settlement offer that would have provided a royalty free license to the asserted patent. Health in Motion countered, requesting payment from Blackbird on the grounds that Health in Motion would ultimately be awarded attorney fees. Blackbird refused. After claim construction, discovery, and fully briefing a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, Blackbird voluntarily dismissed the suit with prejudice, executed a covenant not to sue, and moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court then awarded Health in Motion $363,243.80 in attorney fees.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the attorney fees award. The court agreed that Blackbird’s claim construction and infringement contentions were meritless. The court agreed that Blackbird litigated in an unreasonable manner. The court found multiple problems that supported the exceptional finding, including: (1) Blackbird’s multiple settlement demands that were far less than the anticipated cost of defense, (2) Blackbird unreasonably delayed producing documents, and (3) Blackbird waited until pretrial submissions were due to file a notice of dismissal without first giving notice to opposing counsel. The court also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in considering the need to deter future abusive litigation. The court noted that Blackbird “has filed over one hundred patent infringement lawsuits, and none have been decided, on the merits, in favor of [Blackbird].”
Editor: Paul Stewart
Written by: Mark Kachner
More insights
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation of Patent for Lack of Enablement of Claims Directed to a Method of Treating a Patient with a Unit Dosage in Wyeth Llc v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp
Written by : Eric Furman, Ph.D. and Ashley C. Morales Key Takeaway: Federal Circuit invalidates patent claims directed to a method for treating non-small cell lung cancer through administration of “a unit dosage” of an irreversible epidermal…
When About Becomes Indefinite Federal Circuit Provides Guidance for Life Science Patent Applications Regarding Limits of Approximation in Enviro Tech v Safe Foods
Written by : Jason J. Jardine and Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. Key Takeaway: The term “about” remains useful in biotech and pharmaceutical claims, but only if the patent provides objective guidance about what the term means. Absent that guidance,…
When Any Patent Means No Patent Federal Circuit Reverses Non Specific Verdict
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Sophia F. Zahn OLLNOVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC [OPINION] Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A verdict form…